Consultation opened
21/11/2024
Consultation closed
05/12/2024
Policy Statement published
19/12/2024
19/12/2024
We set out further temporary changes to rules for how firms handle motor finance complaints, where they involve a commission arrangement.
In January 2024, we introduced rules for handling motor finance complaints[2] where there was a discretionary commission arrangement (DCA) between the lender and the broker of the loan. The rules extend the time motor finance firms have to respond to motor finance DCA commission complaints until after 4 December 2025.
In October 2024, the Court of Appeal ruled that it was against the law for brokers to receive a commission of any kind from lenders providing motor finance, without the customer’s informed consent. We anticipate an increase in complaints to motor finance firms about commission arrangements following the Court of Appeal’s judgment. Our new rules extend the time motor finance firms have to respond to complaints about motor finance agreements where there was a commission arrangement other than a DCA. This will help prevent disorderly, inconsistent and inefficient outcomes for consumers and firms.
We are introducing temporary rules for handling motor finance non-DCA commission complaints. The changes broadly mirror the existing rules for motor finance DCA commission complaints. They:
The rules in this policy statement are directly relevant to:
The rules described in this policy statement will come into force on 20 December 2024. The rules mean firms do not have to provide final responses to motor finance non-DCA commission complaints received on or after 26 October 2024 until after 4 December 2025.
Firms must still progress motor finance non-DCA commission complaints in line with the DISP rules. This includes continuing to investigate and collect evidence to help with the eventual resolution of these complaints, taking into account all relevant factors (including the Court of Appeal’s judgment).
We consulted on these rules[3] following the Court of Appeal’s judgment. The judgment, which has since been appealed to the Supreme Court[4], is a significant development in the case law on motor finance commission. It is relevant to both DCAs and non-discretionary commission arrangements, such as fixed or flat fee commission arrangements.
In the consultation paper, we set out our analysis that the judgment is likely to result in a sharp and significant increase in motor finance non-DCA commission complaints. This will create additional pressures on firms and the Financial Ombudsman. The new rules are intended to help ensure that complaints are resolved in an orderly, consistent and efficient way.
Links