Search results
Showing 221 to 230 of 1331 search results for This final notice refers to breaches of FIT.
-
Final Notice 2024: Kulvir Virk [pdf]
This Final Notice refers to breaches of PRIN 1 and PRIN 6 related to a failure to act with integrity and a failure to exercise due care, skill and diligence in the pensions sector. We imposed a financial penalty and a prohibition order. -
Final Notice 2015: Asia Resource Minerals plc (formerly Bumi plc) [pdf]
This final notice refers to breaches of LR and DTR related to listing rules breaches in the issuer sector. We imposed a fine. -
Final Notice 2017: Keep Sheffield Warm [pdf]
This final notice refers to breaches of PRIN 11 related to failing to be -
FCA Final Notice 2013: Kuya J’s Filipino Store Limited [pdf]
This Final Notice refers to breaches of PSR related to failing to be open and co-operative in the -
Final Notice 2019: Prindiville Plc [pdf]
This final notice refers to breaches of PRIN 11 related to failing to be open and cooperative in -
Final notice 2016: Cenkos Securities Plc [pdf]
This final notice refers to listing rules breaches in the sponsor sector. We imposed a fine. -
Final Notice 2020: Aviva plc [pdf]
This Final Notice (Aviva plc) refers to breaches of Listing Rule 1.3.3R and Transparency Rule 1A.3.2R related to Listing rules/DTR breaches in the General Insurance and Protection sector. We issued a public censure. File updated with accessibility -
Final Notice 2022: Simon Tyson [pdf]
This Final Notice (Simon Tyson) refers to breaches of APER 7 related to the failure to ensure compliance with PRIN 3 in the trading firms sector, which led to further breaches of SUP 17, SUP 15 and Article 16 of MAR. We imposed a financial penalty -
Final Notice 2020: Barclays [pdf]
This Final Notice (Barclays) refers to breaches of PRIN 6, PRIN 3, and CONC related to unfair treatment of customers in the Retail Banking sector. We imposed a financial penalty. -
Final notice 2016: Independent Family Advisers Limited [pdf]
This final notice refers to an application for authorisation of Independent Family Advisers Limited. The proposals made in support of the application had the hallmarks of what is sometimes described as “phoenixing”. We refused the application as