Each year we publish a Market Cleanliness (MC) Statistic for takeover announcements in the UK equity markets. This is defined as the proportion of corporate takeover events for which we observed a significant abnormal movement in share price before the takeover announcement.
Market Cleanliness Statistic
We are reviewing the methodology that underlies the Market Cleanliness Statistic. We will publish the figure for 2023, reflecting this change, later this year.
Abnormal Trading Volume
Each year we publish an Abnormal Trading Volume (ATV) Measure. This looks for abnormal increases in trading volumes ahead of potentially price sensitive announcements, covering equity instruments and some equity derivatives.
The ATV measure for 2023 was 5.6%. This is a decrease compared to 2022. We remained in a period of elevated market volatility, driven by global events, which could have affected the ATV measure. This is based on observing abnormal increases in trading volumes in 121 out of 2,163 announcements.
The existence of announcements where we have found statistically significant increases in volumes does not mean that market abuse occurred before each of those announcements. Volumes can fluctuate for many reasons, but it is an indicator that market abuse may have occurred.
Chart
Data table
Potentially Anomalous Trading Ratio
Potentially Anomalous Trading Ratio (PATR) is part of our work to broaden the number of indicators to help assess market cleanliness.
The measure looks at potentially anomalous trading that occurs ahead of a price sensitive news announcement. By potentially anomalous trading we mean:
- the participant does not typically trade in this instrument
- the participant traded significantly more in the direction of the announcement
- the participant made a significant profit from trading positions established in the period immediately prior to the announcement
The PATR for 2023 was 3.3% which represents a small decrease from 4.7% in 2022.
It is important to understand this ratio in the context of the overall level of trading considered for this measure. Some 99.1% of trading activity did not occur during a sensitive time period. For example, not preceding a potentially price sensitive news announcement where the price did move significantly. For the 0.9% of trading activity that justified further review, only 3.3% of that trading was considered potentially anomalous – a very small percentage of overall UK trading activity.
Chart
Data table